Master Data · Data Quality Available
Find where your master data is wrong, and fix what matters first
Rules by dimension, every failing record as a finding, and a weighted score per entity. A profiler shows how your data is filled, and AI suggests rules where coverage is missing.
Items, by dimension
- Completeness92%
- Validity88%
- Consistency81%
- Uniqueness99%
- Plausibility84%
Top findings
- Stocked items without a receiving location37
- Item/warehouses with a blocked supplier9
Example scores and findings.
Rules
Five dimensions of quality
Every rule belongs to a dimension, so you see not only that data is wrong, but in what way.
A tour of the screens
From the score to the record, in five screens
- Dashboard: the score per entity, the weighted coverage and the open findings
- Coverage: which fields have rules, per dimension, and where the gaps are
- Rules: every rule with its dimension, active or not, and its findings
- Findings: the records that break a rule, with the field and the value
- Profiler: how each field is filled, before you write rules
Score per entity
- Items86%49 findings
- Item/warehouse82%112 findings
- Customers91%23 findings
- Suppliers78%61 findings
Example screens, entities and figures.
Rule generation
Generate rules, instead of writing them all by hand
Start from your data: profile it, let AI suggest what is missing, and decide which rules to switch on.
- 1ProfileSee how each field of a table is filled: how often it is empty and which values occur.
- 2SuggestWhere a field has no rule yet, AI proposes one, based on the field and how it is filled.
- 3ReviewYou decide which suggestions become rules, and which you dismiss.
- 4ActivateSwitch the rule on. From then on it counts in the findings, the score and the coverage.
Profiler · item/warehouse
| Field | Filled | Distinct | Most common |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHSL · Location | 96% | 1,240 | A-01 (8%) |
| ALOC · Allocatable | 100% | 2 | 1 (94%) |
| RESP · Responsible | 61% | 14 | (empty) (39%) |
| LEAT · Lead time | 88% | 57 | 14 (31%) |
✦ AI suggestion · completeness
Responsible (RESP) is filled for every active item/warehouse
Based on the profile: 39% of records have no responsible person today.
Example profile and suggestion.
Coverage
See where rules are missing
A matrix of fields against dimensions. At a glance you see what is covered, which rules are switched off, where a rule is missing, and where AI suggests one.
Coverage counts in the score: an entity with few rules can’t look good just because nothing is checked.
Coverage · item/warehouse
| Field | Complete | Valid | Consistent | Plausible | Unique |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHSL Location | ✓ | • | – | – | – |
| SUNO Supplier | • | ✓ | ✦ | – | – |
| REOP Reorder point | • | • | ✓ | ✦ | – |
| LEAT Lead time | • | • | – | ‖ | – |
Example fields.
Making the rules count
Find it, fix it, and stop it coming back
What it brings you
Master data you can rely on
- 1Fix what matters firstFields under governance count as critical, so the score reflects what steers M3.
- 2From score to recordEvery number leads to the records behind it.
- 3Rules where you need themThe coverage view shows which fields have no rule yet, and AI suggests one.
- 4Ready for go-liveKnow whether the data is ready before a migration or a new process.
Next in your journey
Coming next Roadmap
Rules that know which process they protect
With the knowledge graph, each rule will show which process step it protects, what goes wrong when it fails, and how often that process runs in your data.
Make your master data a reason things work
We are onboarding a small group of founding customers. You get the newest features first, a direct line to the team, and founding pricing.
Become a founding customer- Preview features firstPredictor, Debugger, Release Toggle Impact and Value Provenance
- Shape the roadmapYour M3 questions decide what we build next
- Founding pricing, locked inYour rate stays as the product grows